Wednesday, 18 May 2011

'Bodypainting'

There's a lot of bullshit around on the internet - one part of the bullshit that offends me, and that I'm discussing today is 'bodypainting'.

So, here is some fanastic and creative bodypainting:
By Victoris Gugenheim

By Lauren Baker

There is a beautiful and highly skilled culture around bodypainting - there are competitions, festivals and events that celebrate the talent and artistry of serious practitioners.

Bodypainting is NOT something that any random photographer can do. More often than not, unfortunately, it seems like a thinly-guised excuse to touch a naked model. A recent thread (you all know the one) discussed a model having a photographer's handprints all over her (no, he didn't miss the boobs, of course not). No, it is not art. No, it is not professional. Unless you're a doctor of some sort, there is no 'professional' way to grab someone's tits. As a result, I've seen some truely heinous bodypainting online...really really terrible. It's taking a lot of self control not to post it here, but I'm nice.

A few seem to put random swirls on a model, which look like they take about 5 mins (dragged out, of course to prolong the touching) and apparently 'its art'. The same photographers seem to also enjoy bondage photography (is that because it also involves close proximity to the model, I wonder?). There is a photographer on PS/NM famed for his fruit-arrangements on models who openly admits that his shoots are recreating past sexual encounters - all of his shoot themes seem to involve actions or ideas that will involve him touching the model. I've also turned up to a shoot to find one room covered with painty tit-prints from previous models - yes, I left. But it just seem to be normalised. No touching the models, unless ofcourse you have some paint or rope.

Before the smart-arse comes along and says 'well how do you paint a model without touching her', here it is - models, don't just agree to any shoot. Look at the quality of work - is the bodypainting any good? Has the photographer ever done it before? Will they be using decent paints, or will they just buy an acrylic set and try to use that (there's a reason real bodypainters have specialised paints!). Ask if they'll be hiring a professional bodypainter, and then look at their work. Be critical because it's your body - your skin that will get a rash, your image that will be damaged if it looks like you let photographers cop a feel, and ultimately, it's your body that's being used for cheap thrills.

9 comments:

  1. To my mind bodypainting has little to do with photography, it has everything to do with bodypainting. With very few exceptions, bodypainting photographs are simply a record of the body painters work. So why the hell are photographers 'commissioning' bodypainting??

    ReplyDelete
  2.  Really enjoyed this article & couldn't agree more with the last sentence.

    Laylarc X

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not knocking bodypainters - I'm sure it's very difficult - I just don't see the need to actually photograph the result. Canvases are really quite cheap these days and, whilst I like quite a few paintings, I've never seen a bodypainting photograph that wasn't just a little bit shit and cringey.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you! I'm not okay with being touched even by a decent bodypainter because I'm phobic of it but I've lost count of the number of times I've had to refuse a "bodypainting" shoot that would basically be just a random guy painting things that would embarrass a five year old onto my breasts and lady area.

    ReplyDelete
  5.  Some "body painting" is about the photo, not the painting.


    Veruschka's Trans-figurations was a good example:

    ReplyDelete
  6.  Good post - to the people who are saying 'bodypainting is a bit shit even when its done well' that's always going to be a subjective view. Going on about it is detracting from the main point of this post which is if you get involved in a shoot involving body painting make sure the person doing to painting knows what they are doing and is using the right products. Body painting involves similar skills to being a makeup artist and using the right products and proper hygiene procedure is just as important.

    As for not letting some random person touch you up, that's definitely a good maxim to live by. Surely no-one needs that pointing out though? There can't really be someone so naive in the world that they can't spot someone wanting to do finger painting on their boobies is trying it on?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I like this guys stuff: http://cziiki.deviantart.com/

    ReplyDelete
  8. 99.99% of bodypainting looks utter shite.


    FACT!

    ReplyDelete
  9.  Only time I've ever painted on a subject, it was done with a brush mostly by her bar some paint on her back, so no touching involved. And the reason for using the paints - the model was in a dance performance using paint being sloshed around and that was the starting point for the shoot.  The painting was anything but technically good but worked well as a graphic design - the subject loved the photos.

    I'm with Kenp, bodypainting is rarely photographically interesting. Most shots are a record of someone else's skill with a paintbrush. Verushka's work being the odd exception. 

    ReplyDelete